What Are Semantic Data Specifications (SDS)?

Semantic engineers must interpret, exchange, and work with data consistently, regardless of the system architecture or intended application. This consistency is achieved through Semantic Data Specifications (SDS), also called Data Specifications.

The core idea of SDS is to provide both human-readable and machine-readable representations, allowing different teams to understand and implement data requirements consistently. Each artefact in an SDS addresses a unique need, from defining terms and relationships (ontologies) to setting rules on data usage (data shapes). These artefacts create a framework that clarifies and preserves data meaning across contexts, ensuring smooth communication and reducing errors.

Let’s explore SDS’s structure, artefacts, and real-world applications, and see why this framework is so important.

Core Elements of Semantic Data Specifications

A Semantic Data Specification is a collection of artefacts that work together to define a data model. The SDS structure is designed to clarify concepts, align data with business requirements, and make it easy to implement consistently.

🟢 A Collection of Artefacts

An SDS is an artefact set that includes ontologies, data shapes, and technical schemas (like JSON or XML). Each artefact represents a different view or purpose for the same data model, giving semantic/technical teams and business stakeholders what they need to work with data effectively.

🟢 Human and Machine Readability

The purpose of SDS is not just to model data but to make it usable for both humans and machines. Ontologies provide formal definitions, diagrams help people visualize structures, and schemas create technical pathways for data to flow between systems accurately. In other words, an SDS bridges the gap between business stakeholders and technical developers.

🟢 Connecting Business and Technical Needs

Each artefact clarifies the business and technical sides. By defining terms and providing examples or rules for their usage, SDS ensures that everyone interprets data in accordance with the original intent, reducing costly miscommunications and rework.

Semantic Data Specifications create a shared foundation where data is clear, consistent, and ready to be used and understood by any team.

2. What is an Artefact in a Semantic Data Specification?

In the context of Semantic Data Specifications (SDS), an artefact is any component or materialisation that defines, structures, or conveys a data model in a specific representation. Artefacts can be machine-readable (enabling software systems to interpret data accurately) or human-readable (helping knowledge engineers, analysts, and stakeholders understand the model).

Artefacts make data models actionable and interoperable across different systems and contexts. Each artefact addresses specific requirements, concerns, or use cases, contributing to a cohesive, organized framework for consistent data sharing.

Artefacts are categorized based on their function and representation format, typically including:

🟢 Ontologies (Core Vocabularies)

An Ontology, also referred to as a Core Vocabulary, is a formal, machine-readable definition of the concepts and relationships in a data model. Core Vocabularies aim to be reusable and context-neutral, capturing the fundamental characteristics of entities like “person” or “data catalog.” By defining terms, classes, and relationships in a broadly applicable way, ontologies provide the foundation for shared understanding and data interoperability across contexts.

🟢 Data Shapes (Application Profiles)

While ontologies define terms, data shapes tell us how to use them in specific cases. Application Profiles tailor an ontology to fit a particular context by adding constraints. For instance, an Application Profile might specify that a “data catalog” must have at least one “primary topic.” By setting rules for usage, data shapes ensure the data model can adapt to different applications without losing consistency.

🟢 Technical Artefacts (Schemas in JSON, XML, or SQL)

SDS includes various technical artefacts such as JSON-LD, XML schemas, and SQL scripts to make data specifications practical. These artefacts translate the data model into specific formats that allow it to move between systems. Each format supports the same underlying model but caters to the requirements of particular technologies, ensuring that data maintains its meaning regardless of the technical environment.

🟢 Common Artefacts Used in Semantic Data Specifications

Persistent URIs

These unique identifiers serve as stable references for terms, supporting consistent data interpretation across systems and over time.

OWL and SHACL Representations 

OWL (Web Ontology Language) formally defines the relationships between terms in an ontology, while SHACL (Shapes Constraint Language) sets rules on how terms can be used. OWL supports the core vocabulary, while SHACL provides the structure for Application Profiles.

UML Diagrams

Unified Modeling Language (UML) diagrams visually represent the data structure, showing classes, attributes, and relationships. They’re especially useful for non-technical stakeholders to understand data models.

JSON-LD, XML/XSD, SQL

These artefacts adapt the model to specific technological formats. JSON-LD is commonly used for web applications, XML/XSD for document exchanges, and SQL for relational databases. Each format enables the data model to operate within its intended system environment.

🟢 The Role of Artefacts in Semantic Data Specifications

Artefacts are the building blocks of SDS, each serving a purpose that contributes to a unified, consistent data model. By defining clear terms, setting rules, and offering compatible technical representations, artefacts ensure that data is interpreted accurately, reducing errors and improving interoperability across diverse platforms.

Each artefact in an SDS framework builds toward a cohesive data model, making sense of complex data for both business and technical stakeholders.

3. Real-World Application of Semantic Data Specifications: The Case of DCAT

A notable example of Semantic Data Specifications (SDS) in practice is DCAT (Data Catalog Vocabulary). Developed to standardize data catalogs, DCAT brings together the artefacts we’ve discussed (ontologies, data shapes, and technical formats) to create a unified vocabulary that makes data catalogs interoperable across various organizations and countries.

🟢 What is DCAT?

DCAT is a Core Vocabulary that defines the basic structure for cataloging data. It provides terms like “data catalog,” “dataset,” and “distribution,” each with specific properties and relationships. This basic vocabulary enables different organizations to use consistent terms and definitions when setting up data catalogs, making it easier for everyone to understand and share data.

🟢 How Application Profiles Extend DCAT

Application Profiles allow organizations to adapt the core vocabulary to meet specific needs. For example, Romania might create a DCAT Application Profile (DCAT-AP) that adds constraints relevant to their national data cataloging standards. Using Application Profiles, organizations can customize their SDS to fit local regulations or policies without losing the general structure of DCAT, ensuring that their data remains compatible with the broader data ecosystem.

🟢 How DCAT Serves as a Core Vocabulary

DCAT is a Core Vocabulary designed for cataloging data in a flexible and reusable way. By providing a base vocabulary for terms like “dataset,” “distribution,” and “data catalog,” DCAT enables diverse organizations to understand and implement these terms consistently. As a Core Vocabulary, DCAT focuses on essential definitions, making it adaptable for different contexts without sacrificing clarity.

DCAT exemplifies the power of Semantic Data Specifications, providing a versatile vocabulary that adapts locally while aligning with global standards.

4. Common Challenges in Implementing Semantic Data Specifications

Implementing Semantic Data Specifications (SDS) comes with its share of challenges, especially when balancing consistency and adaptability across different systems. Here are some common obstacles and practical solutions:

🟢 Maintaining Consistency Across Artefacts

One of the biggest challenges in SDS implementation is keeping all artefacts aligned. With multiple components, from ontologies to data shapes and technical schemas, inconsistencies can arise if any artefact is updated independently. This makes version control and alignment critical. When one artefact is updated, all related artifacts should reflect those changes to maintain coherence.

🟢 Technology Constraints and Adaptability

Different teams may require different data formats (JSON for APIs, XML for document-based applications, or SQL for databases). An effective SDS should bridge these needs without creating misalignment. Including technology-specific artefacts in SDS ensures that each team has what they need, but managing these formats is key to keeping the SDS usable across diverse platforms.

🟢 Balancing Broad Use with Specific Constraints

While Core Vocabulary is designed for broad applications, Application Profiles, and Implementation Models add constraints to fit particular use cases. Keeping these definitions and constraints separate is essential for flexibility. A Core Vocabulary should define terms broadly, while Application Profiles specify usage without altering the original definitions. This separation prevents conflicts and enables SDS to scale without becoming too rigid or context-dependent.

Implementing Semantic Data Specifications is a balancing act, but overcoming these challenges ensures data remains reliable, adaptable, and ready to support informed decisions across any platform.

5. The Practical Value of Semantic Data Specifications

Semantic Data Specifications (SDS) offer practical, structured solutions to data consistency, clarity, and interoperability challenges. By unifying artefacts like ontologies, data shapes, and technology-specific schemas, SDS frameworks preserve data meaning across various platforms and systems, ensuring that data models remain accurate and adaptable.

SDS creates a foundation for data that can be truly understood and applied in different contexts without losing integrity. It provides a common language that reduces misinterpretations and promotes collaboration across diverse teams and platforms.

For instance, by establishing Core Vocabularies and Application Profiles, SDS can adapt to specific local requirements while remaining interoperable globally, a balance vital for large-scale projects like DCAT.

SDS frameworks enable organizations to build data models that meet specific requirements and align with broader, standardized structures.

SDS ensures that data is accurately represented, shared, and understood through broad Core Vocabulary, adaptable Application Profiles, or detailed Implementation Models.

In data-driven environments, Semantic Data Specifications ensure that data flows freely across boundaries, making it a shared language understood by systems and people.

We invite you to explore this article for additional insights about Semantic Data Specifications.

Meaningfy continues to support the European Commission’s initiatives, leading the charge toward a transparent, efficient, and interconnected European public sector. If you represent a European Institution or a public company that needs to implement an interoperability solution, contact us, and we’ll help you implement it effectively.